As patent protection approaches its final phase, the utility of interim injunctions comes under scrutiny. In Novo Nordisk v. Dr Reddy’s, the Delhi High Court holds that a credible challenge to validity, coupled with the limited remaining patent term, can outweigh claims of irreparable harm, signalling a more context-driven approach to interim relief in pharmaceutical patent disputes.
Tag: patent
Calcutta High Court On Whether The Patent Office Can Merge Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition? And How This Impacts Future Pre Grant Oppositions
The judgment in UPL vs Haryana Pesticides (2026), decided on 5 February 2026 by the Calcutta High Court’s Intellectual Property … More
Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Strict Approach to Section 3(k) (Google LLC v. Controller of Patents)
The Calcutta High Court in Google LLC v. Controller of Patents (decided on 6 August 2025), has reaffirmed the strict … More
Territorial Jurisdiction in Patent Suits – Delhi HC’s Ruling in Kubota vs Godabari
The Delhi High Court in Kubota Corporation vs Godabari Agro Machinery and Services (12 August 2025) dealt with a significant question of territorial … More
Impact of USPTO’s AAPA Restrictions on Patent Drafting
As per news reports the new USPTO guidance restricts use of Applicant Admitted Prior Art (AAPA) in IPRs. It will … More
How to Create a Unique Trademark in India To Avoid Rejection of Trademark Application: A Guide
Are you aware that large number of Trademark Applications get objected to at the initial stage by the Indian Trademark … More
What is a Patent and the Process for Patent Registration in India
In today’s competitive and innovation-driven economy, safeguarding intellectual property (IP) is crucial. A patent is one such tool that provides … More
Order Rejecting Patent Must Be Speaking Order
In Nippon Steel Corporation vs Controller General Of Patents, Designs, The High Court of Delhi in it’s decision dated 29 … More