Why Clear Termination Clauses and Strict Compliance Matter in Intellectual Property Agreements: A Legal Analysis of VVAA Films Pvt. Ltd. v. DUNE Collective LLP

In a commercial relationship involving intellectual property (IP), termination of an agreement can have consequences far beyond the end of … More

The Hidden Intellectual Property Assets In Your Business: What Companies Often Fail To Protect

The Intellectual Property You May Not Know You Own When businesses think of intellectual property (IP), they often associate it … More

Dominant Feature and Phonetic Similarity in Composite Trade Marks

In Asian Paints Limited v. Tarun Paints Private Limited, the Delhi High Court revisited the established doctrine of deceptive similarity in trademark law while examining the competing marks “ASIAN PAINTS” and “ASIA TUFF.” The decision provides a concise application of principles concerning dominant features in composite trademarks, phonetic proximity, and the assessment of consumer confusion where identical goods are involved.

Delhi HC Questions Trade Marks Registry’s Search Process in Ashiana Ispat v. Kamdhenu (2025)

Delhi HC in Ashiana Ispat v. Kamdhenu (2025) questions Trade Marks Registry’s search process, clarifies Rule 33 duty and writ maintainability

Can Film Titles Be Copyrighted? Lessons from Lootere Dispute and Protecting Movie Names

Bombay High Court dismisses injunction plea in Lootere title dispute, holding that film titles don’t attract copyright and association registrations aren’t enforceable against non-members.